Our clients were based in New Malden, Surrey, and owned a two-bedroom residential property with adjoining land held under a single title.
Area: New Malden, Surrey
Capital Raised: £300k
Date: 2019
Our clients were based in New Malden, Surrey, and owned a two-bedroom residential property with adjoining land held under a single title.
Both clients were experienced property professionals, with one working as a builder and the other as an architect, giving them extensive experience in development projects.
The existing property and adjoining land were valued at approximately £540,000, with significant potential for future value enhancement subject to planning approval.
The clients identified an opportunity to develop a new three-bedroom end-of-terrace property on adjacent land.
Their objectives were to:
The wider strategy was designed to unlock substantial value from underutilised land while creating a profitable development opportunity.
This case involved several important complexities that required specialist lender selection and careful structuring.
The transaction centred around title restrictions that limited the clients’ ability to progress the proposed development under existing lending arrangements.
The project also depended on planning approval and future title separation, creating a multi-stage process involving several linked funding and exit strategies.
Traditional lenders were unsuitable due to the title constraints, planning dependency, and development-led nature of the transaction.
We arranged a tailored first-charge bridging loan designed to facilitate planning progression and future development.
The funding solution included:
The structure enabled the clients to overcome existing restrictions, progress planning objectives, and position the project for future development funding and sale.
This case required a strategic and technically focused approach throughout the transaction.
We carried out a detailed assessment of the clients’ planning position, title structure, and wider development strategy before structuring a bridging facility aligned to the proposed multi-stage exit plan.
A suitable lender was sourced that could accommodate planning-led projects, title complexities, and development-focused borrowing while also delivering funding quickly enough to allow the project to progress.
Throughout the process, communication between all parties was managed proactively to ensure the transaction completed efficiently and the development plans could move forward without delay.
The bridging loan completed successfully, enabling the clients to progress their development plans and unlock the potential of the site.
As a result, the clients were able to:
Conclusion:
This case highlights how bridging finance can provide effective solutions for overcoming title restrictions and facilitating development projects where traditional lenders may be unable to accommodate planning or legal complexities.
By focusing on experience, asset value, and exit strategy, bridging lenders can support projects that create substantial additional value and long-term investment opportunities.