Our clients were based in Harrow, Greater London, and owned a converted residential property comprising three self-contained flats valued at approximately £1.05 million.
Area: Harrow, Greater London
Capital Raised: £528k
Date: 2019
Our clients were based in Harrow, Greater London, and owned a converted residential property comprising three self-contained flats valued at approximately £1.05 million.
The property had been fully converted with the appropriate planning permissions and certifications in place, positioning it well for future long-term investment finance.
Both clients were employed professionals with a combined annual income of approximately £125,000 and were looking to expand their property interests while purchasing a new home.
The clients required funding to refinance existing borrowing and support the purchase of a new residential property.
Their objectives were to:
The strategy enabled the clients to unlock value from their existing asset while progressing a new residential purchase simultaneously.
This case involved several important complexities that required specialist lender selection and careful structuring.
The transaction centred around a multi-unit residential property requiring lease creation before long-term refinancing could be achieved.
The clients also needed to release capital quickly to support a new residential purchase, creating a time-sensitive requirement with a refinance-based exit strategy.
Traditional lenders were unsuitable due to the structural complexity of the property, the lease creation process, and the need for short-term flexibility.
We arranged a tailored regulated bridging loan designed specifically to refinance the existing borrowing and release capital for the onward purchase.
The funding solution included:
The structure enabled the clients to repay the existing mortgage, create the required lease structure, and move forward with the purchase while preparing for a future refinance.
This case required a structured and proactive approach throughout the transaction.
We carried out a detailed assessment of the clients’ refinance requirements, property structure, and purchase objectives before arranging a bridging facility aligned to the proposed exit strategy.
A suitable lender was sourced that could accommodate multi-unit residential property security and provide sufficient flexibility while the lease creation process was completed.
Throughout the process, communication between all parties was managed proactively to ensure the funding completed efficiently and the onward property purchase could proceed without delay.
The bridging loan completed successfully, enabling the clients to refinance the existing borrowing and release capital for their new purchase.
As a result, the clients were able to:
Conclusion:
This case highlights how bridging finance can provide effective solutions for multi-unit property refinancing and capital raising where traditional lenders may be unable to accommodate structural or timing complexities.
By focusing on asset value and exit strategy, bridging lenders can support both property expansion plans and long-term investment objectives.